then click back on this blog tab or here to listen as you browse, or not?
2GN2S ...
Pauline Nijenhuis: From conception to creation
Thanks to Rad Nana, in Colorado for sending me this interesting article. Artist, Pauline Nijenhuis, has an inquiring mind. Following the success of her first HAND@WORK
project, Pauline has developed her second in the series to ask: what
differences do we see in the ‘handwriting’ work of five embroidery
artists? And how will the public evaluate the work made by hand in
relation to the same work embroidered by a machine? Moreover, do people,
in this era of growing digitization and robotization, still appreciate
handiwork? We asked Pauline about her process, from concept to
creation, for her HAND@WORK embroidery project and we find out what she
and four other embroiderers
discovered about themselves, and their work,
along the way.What struck me during the project is that an object made by mankind
shows ‘handwriting’ – in this case in embroidery.
The new HAND@WORK
project focuses on the question: what makes something ‘handwriting’ and
what does that add to a work of art? And what does the crafter derive
from making something by hand? This will be my new battle with the machine!
Frank de Wind, TextielLab Tilburg (Textiel Museum)
Embroidery supplies
The participating artists, including myself, used a needle, DMC yarn,
scissors, embroidery ring, logbook and a photographic camera. The embroidery machine used at TextileLab was an SWF model and used a
yarn made of Gunold embroidery thread, which is polyester and viscose
rayon.
Frank de Wind, Textiellab Tilburg
The machine makes 550 stitches per minute. and a total of 22,875 3 cm
stitches were required. Embroidering one piece of this work took 40
minutes. On the other hand, the hand embroiderers took an average of
about 13 hours.
Tessa van Helden
Hinke Schreuders
Mique Menheere
Pauline Nijenhuis
The HAND@WORK project is wrapped up in a multidisciplinary
installation: the five embroidery works by the participating artists,
six machine embroidered works, a film documentary (12 minutes), a large
object called ‘Under Construction’ (see photos) and a digital survey
among visitors. I want to find out from this project the visitors’ opinions about
manufacturing by hand or machine – in this case about embroidery. So
part of the exhibition included a digital survey questioning them about
this. I also asked visitors about their appreciation of handicrafts.
Once the results are analysed, I will write a book with Caroline about this project and our conclusions.
Hand@work installation
I did my best to edit, but the original article, here, is a much better read.
4 comments:
Thanks, Jacki for this interesting how-to. Although you explained it so well I wouldn't be able to do this on my own. I really like your result.
Thank you, Elenor.
This is one of my favorites. I love her expression.
Love the innocence of this child. So many children have had their innocence soiled.
Thanks, John. Yes, I am happy with her.
I agree. Irreputable damage to innocent children
Post a Comment